C-Sharp | Java | Python | Swift | GO | WPF | Ruby | Scala | F# | JavaScript | SQL | PHP | Angular | HTML
Sometimes the shape is uneven. With jagged arrays, we can store efficiently many rows of varying lengths. Any type of data, reference or value, can be used.
Important: Jagged arrays have different performance characteristics. Indexing jagged arrays is fast. Allocating them is somewhat slow.
Example. Let us start. This code is a short (but complete) program you can run in a console project. It creates a jagged array of int elements. It sets values in the array. The program then prints out the result at the end.
Based on: .NET 4.5 C# program that uses jagged arrays using System; class Program { static void Main() { // Declare local jagged array with 3 rows. int[][] jagged = new int[3][]; // Create a new array in the jagged array, and assign it. jagged[0] = new int[2]; jagged[0][0] = 1; jagged[0][1] = 2; // Set second row, initialized to zero. jagged[1] = new int[1]; // Set third row, using array initializer. jagged[2] = new int[3] { 3, 4, 5 }; // Print out all elements in the jagged array. for (int i = 0; i < jagged.Length; i++) { int[] innerArray = jagged[i]; for (int a = 0; a < innerArray.Length; a++) { Console.Write(innerArray[a] + " "); } Console.WriteLine(); } } } Output "1 2" "0" "3 4 5"
This example declares a jagged array. The word jagged doesn't even exist in the C# language. This means that you don't need to use this word in your code. Jagged is just a descriptive variable name I use.
Then: It initializes some values in the jagged array. There are lots of square brackets.
Note: This is very different from a 2D array, which uses commas instead of pure brackets.
Next, we see that indexes in the array are assigned to new int arrays. This is because the earlier statement allocates only the list of empty references to arrays. You have to make your own arrays to put in it.
Also: We see the array initializer syntax here, which is less verbose than some other ways.
Looping over jagged arrays. You will want to examine each item in the jagged array. We must call Length first on the array of references, and then again on each inner array. The Console calls above are just for the example.
2D arrays. We determine how to choose between jagged arrays and 2D arrays. First ask the question: will every row in my collection have the same number of elements? If so, you can consider 2D arrays, but often you have varying numbers of elements.
Performance notes. Second, jagged arrays are faster and have different syntax. They are faster because they use the "newarr", vector IL calls internally. The boost is because they are optimized for starting at 0 indexes.
Method that is reflected for MSIL test: C# private static void CompareIL() { int[,] twoD = new int[1, 1]; // 1 x 1 array twoD[0, 0] = 1; int[][] jag = new int[1][]; jag[0] = new int[1]; jag[0][0] = 1; // 1 x 1 jagged array }
Choosing the syntax. Whichever array type you choose, don't select it because of the syntax. It is important to know that the pairs of brackets indicate "jagged," and the comma in the brackets means "2D".
Tip: You can allocate different arrays for each row in jagged arrays separately. This means your program must use 1D arrays in parts.
Methods. You can use the type of the jagged array in method signatures. They will be passed as references, which is important because it eliminates most copying. Only the reference is copied on each function call.
Also: For local variables only, you can use the var implicit type syntax. This makes programs easier to read.
Benchmark. The .NET Framework has optimizations for this specific case. The 2D array cannot take advantage of them. My opinion is that you should always prefer jagged arrays. They have substantial optimizations in the intermediate language level.
2D array code benchmarked: C# // 2D array of 100 x 100 elements. for (int a = 0; a < 100; a++) { for (int x = 0; x < 100; x++) { int c = a1[a, x]; } } Jagged array code benchmarked: C# // Jagged array of 100 x 100 elements. for (int a = 0; a < 100; a++) { for (int x = 0; x < 100; x++) { int c = a2[a][x]; } } Results 2D array looping: 4571 ms Jagged array looping: 2864 ms [faster]
Summary. We used jagged arrays in a C# program. Jagged arrays are fast and easy to use once you learn the slightly different syntax. Prefer them to 2D arrays when performance is a consideration, and they are not more complex to use.