C# AsParallel Example

Use the AsParallel extension method from System.Linq. See a benchmark of AsParallel on array data.

AsParallel. Query expressions can be run in parallel. With the AsParallel extension method, we enable parallel threads to improve performance. We show a method that becomes twice as fast on a dual-core machine when AsParallel is used.Threads LINQ

Note: AsParallel can make certain queries much faster, and other queries much slower.

Note 2: Performance depends on the target machine and the characteristics of the query and your data source.

Example. We introduce 2 methods. SumDefault sums all the elements in the array with the Sum method alone. SumAsParallel first calls AsParallel on the array. It then calls Sum on the result of AsParallel. The two methods have the same result.Sum

Result: We can see that AsParallel makes the query twice as fast. This is the result on a dual-core machine under light load.

Tip: If you have more than two processor cores, the AsParallel call may increase performance even more.

C# program that uses AsParallel using System; using System.Diagnostics; using System.Linq; class Program { static int SumDefault(int[] array) { /* * * Sum all numbers in the array. * * */ return array.Sum(); } static int SumAsParallel(int[] array) { /* * * Enable parallelization and then sum. * * */ return array.AsParallel().Sum(); } static void Main() { // Generate array. int[] array = Enumerable.Range(0, short.MaxValue).ToArray(); // Test methods. Console.WriteLine(SumAsParallel(array)); Console.WriteLine(SumDefault(array)); const int m = 10000; var s1 = Stopwatch.StartNew(); for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) { SumDefault(array); } s1.Stop(); var s2 = Stopwatch.StartNew(); for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) { SumAsParallel(array); } s2.Stop(); Console.WriteLine(((double)(s1.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds * 1000000) / m).ToString("0.00 ns")); Console.WriteLine(((double)(s2.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds * 1000000) / m).ToString("0.00 ns")); Console.Read(); } } Result for 32767 elements 536821761 536821761 232450.53 ns 118515.85 ns

Discussion. AsParallel will not have great results on all kinds of queries. For small collections, AsParallel will be slower because of the extra method call. For example, I changed the array to only have two elements with Enumerable.Range(0, 2).Range, Repeat, Empty

Result: With two elements, AsParallel makes the query run over 200 times slower instead of two times faster.

Result with two elements 1 1 48.84 ns 10914.27 ns

Example 2. Next, we show a program that you must never run. It uses a static field in a Func implementation. It uses this Func in a parallel query (created by AsParallel()). The program is supposed to count the even numbers in the int array.Func Int Array

However: The AsParallel call causes multiple threads to access the static field. The threads use IsEvenCounter, a non-thread-safe method.

Static

So: The results are unpredictable. In the array with 500 even numbers, this program will count 478, 500, or 517 even numbers.

Odd, Even

Note: If you remove the AsParallel() call from the statement, the result is always 500.

Tip: This program proves that AsParallel is actually creating multiple threads. And this exposes an error in the program design.

C# program that shows AsParallel problem using System; using System.Linq; class Program { static int _counter; static bool IsEvenCounter(int value) { // ... Return whether counter field is even. return Program._counter++ % 2 == 0; } static void Main() { Func<int, bool> func = Program.IsEvenCounter; int[] array = Enumerable.Range(0, 1000).ToArray(); // ... Use parallel query ten times on the array. // ... Write number of results matched by Func. for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { var result = array.AsParallel().Where(func); Console.WriteLine(result.Count()); } } } Output 517 514 500 509 500 478 500 508 500 501

Summary. It is tempting to think that AsParallel makes queries twice as fast if you call it on a computer with a dual-core processor. This is true on certain, long-running queries, but it makes small and fast queries more than 200 times slower.

Note: If you have a query that is computationally intensive, AsParallel might be helpful.

Tip: If you really need better performance an imperative method implementation, with for, might be even better.

For

The Dev Codes

.Net

.NET Array Dictionary List String 2D Async DataTable Dates DateTime Enum File For Foreach Format IEnumerable If IndexOf Lambda LINQ Parse Path Process Property Regex Replace Sort Split Static StringBuilder Substring Switch Tuple

Java

Core Array ArrayList HashMap String 2D Cast Character Console Deque Duplicates File For Format HashSet If IndexOf Lambda Math ParseInt Process Random Regex Replace Sort Split StringBuilder Substring Switch Vector While

TheDeveloperBlog.com

C# AsParallel Example

Related Links:

.Net

Java

Related Links